Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from ACMA and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

Multidrug resistant yeasts in synanthropic wild birds

Alexander Tiong Kah Lord, Kavitha Mohandas*, Sushela Somanath* and Stephen Ambu

Author Affiliations

The International Medical University, No.126, Jalan 19/155B, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

For all author emails, please log on.

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 2010, 9:11  doi:10.1186/1476-0711-9-11

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.ann-clinmicrob.com/content/9/1/11


Received:15 January 2010
Accepted:23 March 2010
Published:23 March 2010

© 2010 Lord et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of multidrug resistant yeasts in the faeces of synanthropic wild birds from the Bangsar suburb of Kuala Lumpur.

Methods

Species characterisations of yeast isolates and determinations of antimycotic susceptibility profiles were undertaken using the commercial characterization kit, Integral System Yeasts Plus (Liofilchem, Italy).

Results

Fourteen species of yeasts were detected in the bird faecal samples.Candida albicans was present in 28.89% of bird faecal samples, Candida krusei (13.33%), Candida tropicalis (4.44%), Candida glabrata (4.44%), Candida parapsilosis (2.22%), Candida lambica (2.22%), Candida stellatoidea (2.22%), Candida rugosa (2.22%) and Candida lusitaniae (2.22%). Amongst the non-candidal yeast isolates, Cryptococcus laurentii was present in 6.67% of bird faecal samples, Cryptococcus uniguttulatus (4.44%), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (4.44%), Trichosporon pullulans (2.22%), Trichosporon pullulans/Cryptococcus albidus (8.89%) and Rhodotorula rubra/Rhodotorula glutinis (4.44%). Of the isolated yeasts, 18.1% (or 26/144) were found to be resistant to all 11 antimycotic agents they were tested against i.e. Nystatin, Amphotericin B, Flucytosine, Econazole, Ketoconazole, Clotrimazole, Miconazole, Itraconazole, Voriconazole, Fluconazole 16 and Fluconazole 64. 45.8% (or 66/144) of the bird faecal yeast isolates were resistant to four or more of the 11 antimycotic agents they were tested against.

Conclusions

This finding is of public health significance as these synanthropic wild birds may be reservoirs for transmission of drug resistant yeast infections to humans.

Background

Wild birds that inhabit urban regions have long been known to harbour human pathogens with zoonotic potential. Amongst reported cases are Listeria monocytogenes in wild birds around Helsinki [1], Chlamydophila psittaci in pigeons and other free-living species in Zagreb [2], Campylobacter spp. in ducks in Washington [3], Salmonella spp. in gulls in the Czech Republic [4], pathogenic Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Salmonella spp., Aeromonas hydrophilia and Providencia alcalifaciens in Canada geese found in London parks [5], Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. in Canada geese in Maryland [6], Eimeria magnalabia (3%), Eimeria hermani (14%), Eimeria truncata (2%) and Tyzzeria parvula in Canada geese in Ontario [7], Histoplasma capsulatum in chickens, pigeons, starlings, blackbirds and bats [8] and West Nile Virus in urban birds in Georgia [9]. In Malaysia, a recent study done by Hwee Yong et al [10] showed the presence of the Enterobacteriaceae and protozoan parasites in the stool of the large billed Crow (Corvus spp.) in Kuala Lumpur. Perhaps the best known example occurring globally is the current situation with Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus (HPAIV) in poultry and migratory wild birds [11]. As such, although the presence of these birds, upon occasion, is aesthetically pleasing in parks and recreational bodies of water, and without doubt, they do function as pollinators within cities, large numbers when present, particularly in the vicinity of high risk areas such as hospitals, are a potential health hazard.

This study focuses on the Bangsar area, an affluent residential suburb of Kuala Lumpur, the capital city of Malaysia. It is heavily populated and endowed with numerous open air restaurants and road side food stalls. Many of the sampling sites chosen for this study were in close proximity to these eateries and had the potential to become contaminated with pathogens that were harboured in bird faeces that littered the surrounding areas. Bangsar also boasts one major hospital, clinics and other nearby hospitals.

Methods

Sample collection

A total of 45 wild bird faecal samples were collected from 12 designated sampling sites from the Bangsar suburb of Kuala Lumpur. Collection of bird faecal samples from these sites was randomised. Fresh faecal samples were collected at two week intervals at 7 pm when the wild birds came to roost for the night. Faecal samples were loaded into eppendorf tubes containing sterile Sabouraud's Dextrose Broth supplemented with 0.5 g/L chloramphenicol (SDB-chmp) to inhibit bacterial growth. Samples were stored in a cooler box and transported to the research laboratory immediately. Upon arrival, samples were weighed, vortexed briefly, then stored at 4°C before processing.

Viability Assay

Cold stored samples were vortexed and plated onto Sabouraud's Dextrose Agar plates supplemented with 0.5 g/L chloramphenicol (SDA-chmp). Immediately after plating, plates were incubated at 37°C in the dark for five days. On the sixth day of incubation, viable counts were taken. Counts were expressed as x CFU per milliliter fresh weight faeces.

Species characterizations and determinations of antimycotic susceptibility profiles

From each of the 45 faecal samples, seven isolates were randomly selected from the SDA-chmp viability assay plates and subcultured twice for purification. Species characterisations of these isolates and determinations of antimycotic susceptibility profiles were undertaken using the commercial characterization kit, Integral System Yeasts Plus (Liofilchem, Italy).

Results

Fourteen species of yeasts were detected (Additional File 1).Candida albicans was present in 28.89% of bird faecal samples, Candida krusei (13.33%), Candida tropicalis (4.44%), Candida glabrata (4.44%), Candida parapsilosis (2.22%), Candida lambica (2.22%), Candida stellatoidea (2.22%), Candida rugosa (2.22%) and Candida lusitaniae (2.22%). Amongst the non-candidal yeast isolates, Cryptococcus laurentii was present in 6.67% of bird faecal samples, Cryptococcus uniguttulatus (4.44%), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (4.44%), Trichosporon pullulans (2.22%), Trichosporon pullulans/Cryptococcus albidus (8.89%) and Rhodotorula rubra/Rhodotorula glutinis (4.44%).

Additional file 1. Chart showing the percentage of wild bird faecal samples that were positive for the genus/species of yeast (n = 45); mean load (m) of each genus/species in positive samples in CFU/ml faeces and range (r) are given in the boxes.

Format: DOC Size: 37KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

A significant proportion of the yeasts isolated from the bird faecal samples were found to be drug resistant or multidrug resistant (Additional Files 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16). 18.1% (or 26/144) were found to be resistant to all 11 of the antimycotic agents they were tested against. 45.8% (or 66/144) of the bird faecal yeast isolates were resistant to four or more of the 11 antimycotic agents they were tested against (Table 1).

Additional file 2. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Candida albicans isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 149KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 3. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Candida parapsilosis isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 31KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 4. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Candida tropicalis isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 29KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 5. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Candida lambica isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 27KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 6. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Candida stellatoidea isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 28KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 7. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Candida glabrata isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 32KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 8. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Candida krusei isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 41KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 9. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Candida rugosa isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 28KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 10. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Candida lusitaniae isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 32KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 11. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Cryptococcus uniguttulatus isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 28KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 12. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Cryptococcus laurentii isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 43KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 13. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 36KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 14. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Trichosporon pullulans isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 48KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 15. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of Rhodotorula isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 36KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Additional file 16. Antimycotic susceptibility profile of unidentified yeast isolates from bird faeces.

Format: DOC Size: 124KB Download file

This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Word ViewerOpen Data

Table 1. Proportion and percentage of drug resistant and multidrug resistant bird faecal yeast isolates by genus/species

The following proportions of isolates demonstrated resistance to four or more antimycotic agents: 13.2% (or 7/53) of the C. albicans isolates, 33.3% (or 1/3) of the C. glabrata isolates, 85.7% (or 6/7) of the C. krusei isolates, 66.7% (or 2/3) of the C. lusitaniae isolates, all (or 2/2) of the C. tropicalis isolates and all (or 1/1) of the C. stellatoidea isolates. Of the noncandidal isolates, 100% (or 8/8) of the Cryptococcus laurentii isolates, 100% (or 2/2) of the T. pullulans isolates, 87.5% (or 7/8) of the T. pullulans/C. albidus isolates, 40% (or 2/5) of the R. rubra/R. glutinis isolates and 69.2% (or 27/39) of the unidentified yeast isolates were resistant to four or more antimycotic agents.

Discussion

The findings of this study indicate the presence of multidrug resistant yeasts in the faeces of synanthropic wild birds in Bangsar. Furthermore, many of the species of yeasts detected are documented human pathogens with zoonotic potential [12].

28.89% of the bird faecal samples harboured C. albicans and this was the most prevalent species of yeast in the faecal samples. European surveys indicate that this species is responsible for more than half the cases of invasive candidaemia; however, the occurrence of non-albicans related disease appears to be increasing [13]. During the past decade there has been an increasing trend of systemic and fatal infections with non albicans species such as Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida lusitaniae and Candida lipolytica. Identification of these species is essential for effective therapy in view of the emergence of resistance to antifungal drugs in these species [14].Candida parapsilosis is a major emerging human pathogen that has dramatically increased in significance and prevalence over the past two decades, and is now one of the leading causes of invasive candidal disease. Individuals at the highest risk for severe infection include neonates and patients in intensive care units [15].

Non-neoformans cryptococci have traditionally been thought of as saprophytes but the incidence of human infection with these species has increased with Cryptococcus laurentii and Cryptococcus albidus together responsible for 80% of non-neoformans reported cases [16]. These species are emerging fungal pathogens to be reckoned with. All eight C. laurentii isolates obtained from this study were resistant to all 11 of the antimycotic agents they were tested against. C. laurentii has been reported as a rare cause of CAPD associated peritonitis, pulmonary and cutaneous infections [17], fungaemia in a premature neonate [18] and invasive disease in a nine-year-old boy with X-linked hyper-immunoglobulin M syndrome [19]. C. albidus has been reported to cause cutaneous infections [20], eye and blood infections in HIV patients [21], pulmonary infection and fungaemia in a leukaemia patient [22] and mucormycosis empyema in a haemodialysis patient [23].

It has been reported that antifungal primary prophylaxis with either itraconazole or fluconazole is effective in reducing the incidence of cryptococcal disease in adults with advanced HIV disease [24]. The results of this study are of concern as the C. laurentii isolates obtained are resistant to both itraconazole, fluconazole and all the other antimycotic agents they were tested against.

Rhodotorula rubra has been implicated in patients suffering from meningitis and keratitis, albeit in the debilitated and the immunocompromised [25,26]. Rhodotorula glutinis on the other hand has been reported to cause meningitis in an immunocompetent patient [27]. Trichosporon pullulans has been reported to have caused pulmonary infection in a leukaemia patient [28], infections in a renal transplant patient [29] and in two patients with chronic granulomatous disease [30], amongst others.

Perhaps what may also be significant are the isolates that have not been identified as they were beyond the resolving power of the commercial identification kit used. 69.2% of them were resistant to four or more antimycotic agents. Some of these isolates may be human pathogens or may have the potential of being human pathogens.

Nosocomial fungal infections are seen to be increasingly significant amongst the critically ill. Fungi are now amongst the most frequently isolated organisms in intensive care units. Reports describe potentially fatal fungal infections that are resistant to many commonly used antifungal agents [31], reminiscent of the drug resistant and multidrug resistant yeasts isolated in this study. It is therefore important to recognize and minimize the major risk factors associated with infection, including the existence of synanthropic animal reservoirs. This study supports previous reports that describe the potential of synanthropic birds as carriers, reservoirs and disseminators of pathogens.

In the Bangsar area, the predominant species of bird are wild crows. Not being of the domesticated variety, these birds would not have encountered antifungal chemotherapy. As such, the drug resistant yeasts obtained in this study are either originally human strains that evolved resistance during human therapy with antifungals and subsequently were disseminated to these wild birds, or alternatively, different mechanisms of antifungal resistance development are at work. Possibly, polyspecific transporters, if they exist in these drug resistant yeasts, may have evolved in response to toxins/poisons that are commonly encountered by the birds that harbour these yeasts, either in the wild or in the cities where they frequently dwell. As such, it would be of epidemiological interest to determine whether (1) sylvatic crows living in proximity to Bangsar harbour similarly drug resistant strains of yeasts, and (2) whether the drug resistant yeast strains obtained in this study are the same as that occurring in hospitals and birds associated with hospitals in the vicinity of the study site.

While mass culling and disposal is the well prescribed method of dealing with contagion in domesticated and wild animals, it is expensive, labour-intensive and does not in any way address the root causes of the problem. As such, it is not a long-term solution and when applied, often does not prevent recurrence of the problem. If colonization with these yeasts is directly associated with the immune status of the birds, then the root of the problem lies in the factors that lower bird vitality. The latter include ecological changes that result from urbanization and growth of megacities, and the lack of or breakdown in sanitation that often ensues. Chemical pollution, noise pollution and climate change as a result of shifting temperatures and precipitation levels, are yet other potential contributory factors to colonization and the emergence of disease, by way of modifying both bird and microbial behaviour.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that synanthropic wild birds in the Bangsar area harbour multidrug resistant Cryptococcus laurentii and other drug resistant and multidrug resistant yeasts. Both the candidal and noncandidal yeast species isolated have been associated with opportunistic and disseminated infections in man, particularly in those with some form of underlying immune suppression, including those on high-dose corticosteroid therapy, having neutropenia or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection [32-35]. In view of the burgeoning immunosuppressed populations both in Malaysia and globally [36,37], the existence and evolution of drug resistant and multidrug resistant strains of yeasts in synanthropic birds that commonly inhabit urban regions, is a source of public health concern.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

Authors' contributions are in the order of listed names. ATKL participated in the study design, carried out the bench work and conducted an extensive literature review. KM and SS participated in the study design and contributed to writing of the manuscript. SA contributed ideas and his broad experience in the field of environmental health. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Ng Kee Peng of the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) for his kind gift of Candida strains. This study was funded by an internal grant from the International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

References

  1. Hellström S, Kiviniemi K, Autio T, Korkeala H: Listeria monocytogenes is common in wild birds in Helsinki region and genotypes are frequently similar with those found along the food chain.

    J Appl Microbiol 2008, 104(3):883-888. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Prukner-Radovčić E, Horvatek D, Gottstein Ž, Ciglar I, Grozdanić , Mazija H: Epidemiological investigation of Chlamydophila psittaci in pigeons and free-living birds in Croatia.

    Vet Res Commun 2005., 29(Supplement 1) OpenURL

  3. Pacha RE, Clark GW, Williams EA, Carter AM: Migratory birds of central Washington as reservoirs of Campylobacter jejuni.

    Canad J Microbiol 1988, 34:80-82. OpenURL

  4. Cizek A, Literak I, Hejlicek K, Treml F, Smola J: Salmonella contamination of the environment and its incidence in wild birds.

    J Vet Med 1994, 41(5):320-327. OpenURL

  5. Feare CJ, Sanders MF, Blasco R, Bishop JD: Canada goose (Branta canadensis) droppings as a potential source of pathogenic bacteria.

    J Royal Soc Health 1999, 119(3):146-155. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Graczyk TK, Fayer R, Trout JM, Lewis EJ, Farley CA, Sulaiman I, Lal AA: Giardia sp. cysts and infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in the feces of migratory Canada geese (Branta canadensis).

    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1998, 64(7):2736-2738. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  7. Skene RC, Remmler O, Fernando MA: Coccidia of Canada Geese (Branta canadensis) at Kortright Waterfowl Park, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, with description of Isospora anseris n. sp.

    Canad J Zool 1981, 59:493-497. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. Canadian Centre for Occupational Health & Safety: Histoplasmosis. [http://www.oshcanada.com/oshanswers/diseases/histopla.html] webcite

  9. Willis J: Wild bird mortality and West Nile Virus surveillance: biases associated with detection, reporting and carcass persistence.

    J Wildlife Dis 2006, 42(1):92-106. OpenURL

  10. Lee HY, Ambu S, Devi S, Maung M: Detection of protozoan and bacterial pathogens of public health importance in faeces of Corvus spp.(large-billed crow).

    Trop BioMed 2008, 25(2):134-139. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. World Health Organisation: H5N1 Avian Influenza: Timeline of major events. [http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/Timeline090727.pdf] webcite

  12. Weber W: Pigeon Associated People Diseases. [http://www.avianweb.com/pigeonassociateddiseases.html] webcite

  13. Lass-Flörl C: The changing face of epidemiology of invasive fungal disease in Europe.

    Mycoses 2009, 52(3):197-205. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Ng KP, Saw TL, Na SL, Hoo TS: Systemic Candida infection in University Hospital 1997-1999: the distribution of Candida biotypes and antifungal susceptibility patterns.

    Mycopathologia 2001, 149:141-146. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Trofa D, Gácser A, Nosanchuk JD: Candida parapsilosis, an emerging fungal pathogen.

    Clin Microbiol Rev 2008, 21(4):606-25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  16. Khawcharoenporn T, Apisarnthanarak A, Mundy LM: Non-neoformans cryptococcal infections: a systematic review.

    Infection 2007, 35(2):51-53. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Mycology Online: Cryptococcus laurentii. [http:/ / www.mycology.adelaide.edu.au/ Fungal_Descriptions/ Yeasts/ Cryptococcus/ C_laurentii.html] webcite

  18. Cheng MF, Chiou CC, Liu YC, Wang HZ, Hsieh KS: Cryptococcus laurentii fungemia in a premature neonate. [http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=87980] webcite

    J Clin Microbiol 2001, 39(4):1608-1611. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  19. Simon G, Erdös M, Maródi L: Invasive Cryptococcus laurentii disease in a nine-year-old boy with X-linked hyper-immunoglobulin M syndrome.

    Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005, 24(10):935-7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  20. Narayan S, Batta K, Colloby P, Tan CY: Cutaneous Cryptococcus infection due to C. albidus associated with Sezary syndrome.

    Br J Dermatol 2000, 143:632-4. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. Garelick JM, Khodabakhsh AJ, Lopez Y, Bamji M, Lister M: Scleral ulceration caused by Cryptococcus albidus in a patient with acquired immune deficiency syndrome.

    Cornea 2004, 23:730-1. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Wells GM, Gajjar A, Pearson TA, Hale KL, Shenep JL: Brief report: Pulmonary cryptosporidiosis and Cryptococcus albidus fungemia in a child with acute lymphocytic leukemia.

    Med Pediatr Oncol 1998, 31:544-6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. Horowitz ID, Blumberg EA, Krevolin L: Cryptococcus albidus and mucormycosis empyema in a patient receiving hemodialysis.

    South Med J 1993, 86:1070-2. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Chang LW, Phipps WT, Kennedy GE, Rutherford GW: Antifungal interventions for the primary prevention of cryptococcal disease in adults with HIV.

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, (3):CD004773. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  25. Elias ML, Soliman AK, Mahoney FJ, Karam El-Din AZ, El-Kebbi RA, Ismail TF, Wasfy MM, Mansour AM, Sultan YA, Pimentel G, Earhart KC: Isolation of Cryptococcus, Candida, Aspergillus, Rhodotorula and Nocardia frommeningitis patients in Egypt.

    J Egypt Public Health Assoc 2009, 84(1-2):169-81. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  26. Thakur K, Singh G, Agarwal S, Rani L: Meningitis caused by Rhodotorula rubra in an human immunodeficiency virus infected patient.

    Indian J Med Microbiol 2007, 25(2):166-8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  27. Lanzafame M, Checchi G, Parinello A, Trevenzoli M, Cattelan AM: Rhodotorula glutinis-Related Meningitis.

    J Clin Microbiol 2001, 39(1):410. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  28. Shigehara K, Takahashi K, Tsunematsu K, Koba H, Katoh S, Asakawa M, Suzuki A: A Case of Trichosporon pullulans Infection of the Lung with Adult T-cell Leukemia.

    Japanese Journal of Medicine 1991, 30(2):135-137. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  29. Hughes CE, Serstock D, Wilson BD, Payne W: Infectionwith Trichosporon pullulans.

    Annals Of Internal Medicine 1988, 108(5):772-773. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

  30. Holland S, Shea Y, Kwon-Chung J: Trichosporon pullulans infection in 2 patients with chronic granulomatous disease.

    Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2004, 114(1):205-206. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  31. Toscano CM, Jarvis WR: Clinical Updates: National Foundation For Infectious Diseases: Epidemiology and Clinical Aspects of Unusual Fungal Nosocomial Infections. [http://www.nfid.org/publications/fungal_archive/noso.html] webcite

  32. Hidalgo JA: Candidiasis. [http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/213853-overview] webcite

  33. Maves RC: Trichosporon Infections. [http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/230705-overview] webcite

  34. Rhodotorula spp [http://www.doctorfungus.org/thefungi/rhodotorula.htm] webcite

  35. Ventriculitis Due to Cryptococcus uniguttulatus: Discussion [http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/410704_3] webcite

  36. Chong PP, Ching-Soo DC, Lee YL, Hafeez A, Nor Shamsudin M, Heng FS, Ng KP: Recurrent candidaemia in a neonate with Hirschsprung's disease: fluconazole resistance and genetic relatedness of eight Candida tropicalis isolates.

    J Med Microbiol 2006, 55:423-428. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  37. Nguyen MH, Peacock JE, Morris AJ, Tanner DC, Nguyen ML, Snydman DR, Wagener MM, Rinaldi MG, Yu VL: The changing face of candidemia: emergence of non-Candida albicans and antifungal resistance.

    Am J Med 1996, 100:617-623. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL