Log on/register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
 
Open AccessHighly AccessResearch

Quinine sulfate and bacterial invasion

Ronni Wolf1 email, Adone Baroni2 email, Rita Greco3 email, Giovanna Donnarumma3 email, Eleonora Ruocco2 email, Maria Antonietta Tufano3 email and Vincenzo Ruocco2 email

Dermatology Unit, Kaplan Medical Center, Rechovot, Israel

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Second University of Naples, Italy

Department of Experimental Medicine, Microbiology Section, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Second University of Naples, Italy

author email corresponding author email

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials 2002, 1:5doi:10.1186/1476-0711-1-5

Published: 22 October 2002

Abstract

Background

As many patients who receive antimalarial drugs for treatment of noninfectious, inflammatory diseases are also immunosuppressed and might have a concomitant bacterial infection, we studied the effectiveness of these drugs against bacterial infections, to find out whether they could protect against (and even treat) such conditions and obviate the need for an additional antibiotic drug.

Methods

Effect of QS on bacterial growth: Escherichia coli (E. coli) HB101 pRI203 were cultured overnight at 37°C in TSB and inoculated (approx 1 × 107 cells /ml) in MEM in the presence of QS at various concentrations (0, 50 and 100 μM).

The effect of QS at concentration of 50 and 100 μM on the entry process of E. coli HB101 pRI203 into HeLa cells was studied under different experimental conditions: 1. QS was incubated with 3 × 105 HeLa cells for 60 min at 37°C prior to infection. 2. QS was added to HeLa cell monolayers during the infection period.

Results

QS showed no antibacterial activity after 24 h of incubation.

The invasive efficiency of the bacteria was significantly inhibited at a dose-dependent manner, when QS was added to HeLa cells for 60 min at 37°C prior to infection (condition 1), and to a lesser extent when added during the period of infection (condition 2).

Conclusions

Although the antimalarials are generally regarded as being inactive against most extracellular bacterial species, our results indicate that QS significantly inhibited the internalization/invasion efficacy of E. coli in the host cells.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.